{
  "synthetic": true,
  "capability": "vendor-rule-audit",
  "status": "available",
  "scenario": "One broad vendor rule categorized transactions consistently last year but conflicts with recent purchases.",
  "sourceTable": {
    "columns": [
      "Vendor",
      "Rule account",
      "Transactions",
      "Overrides"
    ],
    "rows": [
      [
        "Example Marketplace",
        "Office supplies",
        "84",
        "19"
      ],
      [
        "Sample Fuel",
        "Vehicle fuel",
        "46",
        "1"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "deterministicRule": "Measure rule coverage and override frequency, then inspect whether conflicts reflect vendor ambiguity or a stale rule.",
  "flaggedFinding": "Example Marketplace has a 23% override rate, too high for an unconditional office-supplies rule.",
  "possibleReasons": "The vendor sells multiple categories, so a narrower memo, amount, cardholder, or class condition may work better than deleting automation.",
  "humanReviewQuestions": [
    "Which purchases were overridden?",
    "Is there a reliable secondary condition?",
    "Which transactions must stay manual?"
  ],
  "operatingDecision": "Stage a narrower rule proposal and have a finance professional test it against historical exceptions before approval."
}