National Review Benchmarks Misrank A Third Of Contractors
Benchmarks
Every review benchmark you have read is national. Review volume is mostly a function of metro density, so a national percentile tells most contractors something false about their own market.
Sam Yang, Stanford MBA, ex-CFO across trades, SaaS, services
The Same Review Count, Two Opposite Answers
The median HVAC contractor in California has 26 reviews. In Arkansas, the median is 4.
A shop with 12 reviews is therefore below the bottom quartile in California and comfortably above the median in Arkansas. Both of those shops read the same national benchmark, and it tells them the same thing. At least one of them is being badly misled.
We measured how often that happens. Across roughly 105,000 operating trade listings, we ranked every shop nationally and then against its own state, and compared:
| Trade | Misranked by 10+ percentile points | Highest state median | Lowest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landscaping | 38.6% | Nevada, 14 | South Carolina, 4 |
| Electricians | 38.1% | California, 11 | Wisconsin, 3 |
| Plumbing | 37.3% | Nevada, 14 | Indiana, 4 |
| HVAC | 36.7% | California, 26 | Arkansas, 4 |
| Roofing | 30.4% | California, 15 | Iowa, 3 |
Between three and four contractors in ten are told they sit somewhere they do not. Not slightly off: more than ten percentile points off.
Review Volume Measures Your Metro, Not Your Work
The mechanism is not subtle. Reviews accumulate from transaction volume and from local reviewing culture, both of which track population density and platform adoption. A perfectly run shop in rural Arkansas will accrue reviews more slowly than a mediocre one in Los Angeles, because there are fewer customers and a smaller share of them leave reviews.
So a national review count is closer to a proxy for where you operate than for how well you operate. Ranking a contractor against the national distribution ranks him partly against a market he does not compete in.
The people he actually competes with are the shops a customer sees alongside him in a local search result. That is the comparison set that matters, and it is a state or metro comparison, never a national one.
What "Enough Reviews" Actually Means
There is no national answer to how many reviews a contractor needs, which is why every article that gives one is wrong.
Nationally, the median HVAC shop has 9 reviews, the bottom quartile has 4 or fewer, and the top 10% has 65 or more. Those numbers are real and nearly useless on their own, because the spread between states is larger than the spread between quartiles within most states.
The useful version is local. In California, HVAC breaks at 4 reviews for the bottom decile, 9 for the bottom quartile, 26 at the median, 76 for the top quartile and 187 for the top 10%. In Arkansas the same five breakpoints are 2, 3, 4, 8 and 17.
"Enough" means enough to clear the median in your own state. For most contractors that is a much smaller number than the national top-decile figures imply, and it is achievable in a quarter rather than a year.
Free benchmark review
See how your margins benchmark.
We compare your jobs, crews, and service lines against real margin data, then show which gaps deserve the free audit.
The Part Nobody Selling You Reputation Software Will Say
Review volume does not predict revenue for a contractor of your size.
Across the whole market, review count and revenue do move together, and that correlation gets quoted a great deal. It is driven by very large firms. Inside the under-$20M range, where most contractors operate, it collapses to roughly nothing: we measure r=0.11.
Star rating is weaker still. Ratings cluster tightly across every trade we examined, with most sitting near a 4.0 median, so rating is a poor differentiator for getting into a conversation at all.
The honest reading of both facts together:
Reviews decide whether a homeowner calls you. A shop with two reviews reads as a risk no matter how good both of them are. That gate is real, and it is worth clearing.
Reviews do not decide what a commercial building pays you. If your work is commercial, review count is close to irrelevant to your revenue. What decides your year is which buildings you serve and what those buildings are actually worth, which is a different question with a different answer.
That second point is also why the within-ICP correlation dies. Our ICP is commercial-heavy, and commercial work is not won on Yelp.
What To Do
Rank yourself against your state, not the country. The review percentile calculator does this for five trades across 164 published state curves, and it will tell you when your state's sample is too thin to publish rather than quietly falling back to a national figure.
Ask at the moment the job closes. The fastest reputation gain in the trades is not a software purchase, it is asking when the customer is most willing and least likely to have been asked. If your count is below your state median, the gap is usually a handful of reviews, not a hundred.
Decide whether reviews are your lever at all. For residential demand they gate the first call. For commercial work the same effort spent understanding which customers and which jobs are actually profitable moves far more revenue.
How This Was Measured
Review counts for operating listings only, drawn from a scrape of roughly 110,000 US trade contractor locations from public business listings, April 2026. Closed businesses are excluded: a closed shop's review count describes a business nobody can hire.
Every listing is assigned to a single primary trade in a fixed priority order to avoid double counting. Percentiles are nearest-rank over observed counts, so every breakpoint is a real review count rather than an interpolated one. A state is published only where it carries at least 100 listings for that trade, which is why HVAC has 44 published states and plumbing has 26.
The misranking rate is computed directly rather than estimated: for every shop in a published state, we take its percentile within its state and its percentile nationally, and count the share where those differ by more than 10 points.
This is directory data, and we grade it as such. It is suitable for market-structure analysis, not for underwriting an individual business. Aggregates only, and no individual listing is identified.
The full distributions, including star ratings and listing claim rates by trade, are published in the contractor reputation benchmarks, free to cite with attribution.
Get the next one
Want next week's benchmark in your inbox?
One email a week. Real numbers from 2,200+ service businesses. No fluff. Unsubscribe anytime.
Related reads
Benchmarks
Building Age Doubles Replacement Work and Does Nothing to Service Revenue
Older buildings do not spend more on mechanical service. They spend more on replacement. Split the revenue and a 1.85x effect appears where total revenue shows nothing, measured across 25,912 buildings.
Benchmarks
Square Footage Explains 9% Of What A Building Spends On Mechanical Service
The industry prices buildings per square foot across a 14x range. We measured it: floor area explains 9% of the variance, and dividing by area adds 19% more variance than it removes.
Benchmarks
Cleaning Business Labor Cost as a % of Revenue: The 2026 Benchmark
Janitorial and commercial cleaning labor runs 45-55% of revenue; top operators hold the low 40s. What drives the gap by account, and how to read your own number before it eats your margin.

About the author
Sam Yang
Founder & CEO
Founder of Level, the AI operating layer for contractors and skilled trades, and the other operating businesses where scarce labor is the constraint. Ex-CFO across trades, SaaS, and service businesses. 4 years as Director of Growth Product at BuildOps, building financial tooling used by 1,000+ commercial contractors. Four years in PE and investment banking rolling up and acquiring service businesses, $2.5B in total transactions including M&A and IPOs. Stanford MBA, Brown undergrad. The Level founding team's analysis of 2,200+ contractors ($13.25B in revenue) across operating, private-equity, and CFO roles anchors the Level Index benchmark research.
LinkedIn