Guided synthetic example
See the check from input to decision
Most July close work is complete, but one reconciliation and one accrual schedule remain unresolved.
This is the operating model we use at Level. The percentages are estimated shares of the work in a typical review. Actual effort varies with data quality, complexity, and the issue found.
1Start with the source records
About 15% of work| Close area | Status | Evidence |
|---|
| Bank reconciliations | Blocked | 1 account open |
| Accrual schedules | Unknown | Support missing |
| AR subledger | Ready | Tied |
| Reviewer sign-off | Blocked | Pending |
2Run the deterministic check
About 20% of workRequire fresh evidence for every applicable close control and preserve ready, blocked, unknown, and not-applicable separately.
3Surface the flagged result
About 10% of workNeeds review
July is not close-ready because a bank account is unreconciled, accrual evidence is missing, and sign-off is pending.
4Use recorded finance judgment to analyze possible reasons
About 25% of workAt Level, we record the review logic, known explanations, and questions our finance professionals use in this situation. AI applies that documented human judgment to organize the most plausible reasons, without pretending it knows which reason is true.
Possible reasons to investigate
The remaining items may be small, but close readiness depends on control completion, not just estimated dollar impact.
5Make the final human judgment
About 20% of workA Level finance professional validates the source evidence, challenges the AI-assisted analysis, and decides which explanation is supported.
Who owns each blocker?
Is the source evidence current?
Has the reviewer signed the completed controls?
6Make the operating decision
About 10% of workResolve the named blockers and obtain controller sign-off before declaring the period closed.