Open finance skill
AR integrity review
Do invoice, payment, deposit, and balance records tell the same story?
Trace receivables from invoice through payment and deposit, including partially paid and closed-with-balance exceptions.
Inputs
- ✓Invoices
- ✓Payments
- ✓Deposits and balances
Outputs
- ✓Matched chain
- ✓Broken links
- ✓Balance exposure
Checks performed
- ✓Invoice-to-payment match
- ✓Payment-to-deposit match
- ✓Status-versus-balance conflict
Guided synthetic example
See the check from input to decision
An invoice is marked closed even though its recorded payments do not cover the invoice total.
This is the operating model we use at Level. The percentages are estimated shares of the work in a typical review. Actual effort varies with data quality, complexity, and the issue found.
Start with the source records
About 15% of work| Invoice | Status | Invoice total | Payments | Remaining |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-901 | Closed | $12,000 | $9,500 | $2,500 |
| INV-902 | Posted | $4,800 | $4,800 | $0 |
Run the deterministic check
About 20% of workRecompute the invoice balance from invoice and payment records, then compare money state with workflow status.
Surface the flagged result
About 10% of workNeeds review
INV-901 is closed with a computed $2,500 remaining balance.
Use recorded finance judgment to analyze possible reasons
About 25% of workAt Level, we record the review logic, known explanations, and questions our finance professionals use in this situation. AI applies that documented human judgment to organize the most plausible reasons, without pretending it knows which reason is true.
Possible reasons to investigate
The difference could be a write-off, credit, missing payment, migration issue, or an incorrect status.
Make the final human judgment
About 20% of workA Level finance professional validates the source evidence, challenges the AI-assisted analysis, and decides which explanation is supported.
Make the operating decision
About 10% of workTrace payment, credit, and write-off evidence before correcting the receivable or documenting the resolution.
Use this system
Start with the example, then inspect the structure
- Download the invented input and expected output.
- Replace one field at a time with a safe test value.
- Compare the result with the expected structure.
- Have a finance professional review every exception before acting.
MCP preview
run_synthetic_example {"slug":"ar-integrity-review"}Human review is part of the system
This check organizes evidence and surfaces exceptions. A person with finance domain expertise still needs to interpret the result, validate the source records, and discuss the operating decision.
Open source does not mean open client data. We publish reusable finance tools, checks, templates, and playbooks. Client records, workpapers, credentials, communications, and private configurations remain confidential.